Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage in Escherichia coli
نویسنده
چکیده
INTRODUCTION............................................................ 61 PROCESSING OF DAMAGED DNA ............................................................ 61 SOS REGULATORY NETWORK ............................................................. 61 Present Model for SOS Regulation ............................................................ 62 SOS Responses ............................................................ 62 Development of the Model for SOS Regulation .................................. .......................... 64 Genetic studies of recA and lexA .6....................................4i................... 64 Deduction of the essential elements of SOS regulation .......................................................... 65 Identification of genes in the SOS network............ ............ 66 Biochemical studies of SOS regulation............................................................ 67 SOS-Inducing Signal ............................................................ 67 Central role of RecA activation ............................................................. 67 Agents and treatments which cause SOS induction ............................................................ 68 Indirect induction.6.............................. . . . .. . .. . .. . . 68 Role of DNA replication ............................................................ 68 Involvement of small molecules .................................... ...................... . .68 Role of single-strand DNA-binding protein ........................................................... 69 Fine Tuning in the Induction of the SOS System ........................................................... 69 Intermediate states of induction.............................................................69 Factors influencing the extent of SOS induction ............................................................ 70 Strategies for modulating individual genes within the SOS network....................................... . 70 INDUCTION OF HEAT SHOCK GENES BY DNA-DAMAGING AGENTS .................................... 71 ADAPTIVE RESPONSE TO METHYLATING AND ETHYLATING AGENTS ........... ................... 71 Biochemistry of the Adaptive Response ................. ........................................... 72 06-Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase .................. ......................................... 72 3-Methyladenine-DNA glycosylase II............................................................. 72 Regulation of the Adaptive Network .............. .............................................. 72 Effect of the Adaptive Response on Mutagenesis................................ ........................... 72 Comparison of the SOS, Heat Shock, and Adaptive Regulatory Systems ............... ....................... 73 ROLE OF SOS PROCESSING IN MUTAGENESIS ............................................................ 73 Mutagenesis by UV and Most Chemicals Is Not a Passive Process ....................... ....................... 73 Weigle reactivation and Weigle mutagenesis ............................................................. 73 Bacterial mutagenesis ............................................................. 74 Significance of umuD and umuC Mutations ............................................................. 74 Isolation of umuD and umuC mutations............................................................. 75 Identification of the umuD and umuC gene products ............................................................ 75 umuD and umuC Analogs on Naturally Occurring Plasmids ...................................................... 75 pKM101 ............................................................. 75 Relationship of pKM101-mediated processes to cellular gene functions ...................................... 76 mucA and mucB genes of pKM101 are analogs of umuD and umuC ............... ......................... 76 Distribution of umuDC functions in other bacteria ............................................................. 76 A Second Requirement for the RecA Protein in Mutagenesis .................................................... 77 Effect of the recA430 mutation on mutagenesis ............................................................. 77 Evidence suggesting that UV mutagenesis does not require the induction of genes other than those repressed by LexA ..................................................... 77 Other evidence...................................77 Targeting of UV and Chemical Mutagenesis ................................ 78 Most UV and chemical mutagenesis is targeted ........................................................ ..78 Hotspots ......................................................... 78 Concept of HFOs and LFOs ......................................................... 79 (i) HFOs ......................................................... 79 (ii) LFOs ........................................................... 79 Consequences of SOS Processing of DNA Not Damaged by Exogenous Agents ........... ................... 79 Relationship of SOS processing to the spontaneous mutation frequency ............ ........................ 79 Mutagenesis of undamaged bacteriophage in SOS-induced cells which depends on SOS processing 80
منابع مشابه
Loss of photoreversibility of damage to deoxyribonucleic acid replication in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli B-r thy trp.
Loss of photoreversibility (LOP) of the ultraviolet (UV) damage which prevents reinitiation of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication occurred with incubation of Escherichia coli B/r thy trp cultures after UV doses of 240, 320, and 400 ergs/mm(2). LOP occurred at the time of reinitiation of DNA replication in the cultures (i.e., after postirradiation lag periods of 45 min or more). Neither the...
متن کاملTransformation of Escherichia coli by chromosomal deoxyribonucleic acid from Salmonella typhi.
The genetic transformation of Escherichia coli K-12 with chromosomal deoxyribonucleic acid purified from Salmonella typhi is described.
متن کاملNitrous Acid Damage to Duplex Deoxyribonucleic Acid: Distinction Between Deamination of Cytosine Residues and a Novel Mutational Lesiont
The rate of nitrous acid deamination of labeled cytosine residues in native Escherichia coli deoxyribonucleic acid was monitored in vitro by release of acidsoluble counts after treatment with uracil deoxyribonucleic acid glycosylase. The reaction exhibited a lag and was not stimulated by several agents previously shown to enhance base substitution mutagenesis during nitrous acid treatment of du...
متن کاملNitrous acid damage to duplex deoxyribonucleic acid: distinction between deamination of cytosine residues and a novel mutational lesion.
The rate of nitrous acid deamination of labeled cytosine residues in native Escherichia coli deoxyribonucleic acid was monitored in vitro by release of acid-soluble counts after treatment with uracil deoxyribonucleic acid glycosylase. The reaction exhibited a lag and was not stimulate by several agents previously shown to enhance base substitution mutagenesis during nitrous acid treatment of du...
متن کاملGreater vulnerability of the infecting viral strand of replicative-form deoxyribonucleic acid of bacteriophage phi X174.
Four types of phiX-infected cells of Escherichia coli CR, a thymine-requiring strain of E. coli C, were prepared in which the parental replicative-form deoxyribonucleic acid (RF DNA) was labeled with same specific amounts of bromouracil in (i) both strands, (ii) only the infecting viral strand, (iii) only the complementary strand, and (iv) neither strand. The sensitivity of each type of infecte...
متن کاملThymine Starvation and Single-Strand Breaks in Chromosomal Deoxyribonucleic acid of Escherichia coli.
Single-strand breaks, as measured by the McGrath and Williams procedure, occur in chromosomal deoxyribonucleic acid of Escherichia coli cells during thymine starvation.
متن کامل